Measurement of Seasonal Variation by Ratio to Trend Method Lecture 07

 Measurement of Seasonal Variation by Ratio to Trend Method 

Lecture 07

The ratio to trend values approach is similar to the ratio to moving average method. The method for calculating tend values (TC) is the only distinction. The trend values are calculated by using the least squares method. The ratio-to-trend method, which isolates the seasonal effect, is used to determine the following ratios:

TCSI / TC * 100

The steps of the method are summarised as follows:

1. Use the least-squares approach to compute the trend values.

2. Take the trend value out. By dividing the original data values by the associated trend values and multiplying these ratios by 100 in a multiplicative model, the trend is removed. The results produced in this manner are trend-free.

3. For each year, group the percentage data values from Step (ii) according to the months or quarters that apply. 

De Trending

The process of eliminating the impacts of the trend component from time series data that have been seen. Detrending is mostly used to identify seasonal or cyclical patterns efficiently.

Assume multiplicative model; the observed time series is given by

Yt = TCSI

SI = TCSI / TC * 100

Assume additive model

Yt = T + C + S + I

SI = T + C + S + I - T - C

The detrended time series is also known as the stationary time series.

There are two common methods used to detrend the time series data:

Detrend by the Ratio-to-Trend method

In ratio to the trend method, the observed time series (Yt = TCSI) is divided by trend estimated values (Yt^ = TC). 

i.e., 

SI = Yt / Y^t * 100

Detrend by Differencing

In this method a new data set is developed by the difference between itself and previous observations.

Y^t = Y^t - Y^t-1

Practice Question

The data given below is the average annual sale (00, 000, 000) of the shop.

Year

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

sale

8

13

18

14

13

18

24

20

18

24

Year

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

 

Sale

27

20

28

32

29

28

30

37

34

 

Assume both multiplicative and additive models and detrend the data by the least squares method.

Solution

Assume a multiplicative model and use the ratio to the trend line.

year

Yt

Yt x t

t^2

Y^t = 39.52 + 1.3174 t

SI = Yt / Y^t * 100

1990

8

-9

-72

81

27.6625

28.92002

1991

13

-8

-104

64

28.98

44.85852

1992

18

-7

-126

49

30.2975

59.41084

1993

14

-6

-84

36

31.615

44.28278

1994

13

-5

-65

25

32.9325

39.47468

1995

18

-4

-72

16

34.25

52.55474

1996

24

-3

-72

9

35.5675

67.47733

1997

20

-2

-40

4

36.885

54.22258

1998

18

-1

-18

1

38.2025

47.11734

1999

24

0

0

0

39.52

60.72874

2000

27

1

27

1

40.8375

66.1157

2001

20

2

40

4

42.155

47.44396

2002

28

3

84

9

43.4725

64.40853

2003

32

4

128

16

44.79

71.44452

2004

29

5

145

25

46.1075

62.89649

2005

28

6

168

36

47.425

59.04059

2006

30

7

210

49

48.7425

61.54793

2007

37

8

296

64

50.06

73.91131

2008

34

9

306

81

51.3775

66.17683

435

751

570

 


Estimated trend line


Assume additive model and using differencing method

Year

Yt

SI = Y^t - Y^t-1

1990

8

 

1991

13

5

1992

18

5

1993

14

-4

1994

13

-1

1995

18

5

1996

24

6

1997

20

-4

1998

18

-2

1999

24

-6

2000

27

3

2001

20

-7

2002

28

8

2003

32

4

2004

29

-3

2005

28

-1

2006

30

2

2007

37

7

2008

34

-3


Practice Question

The profit of a grocery store is given below:

Year

Q 1

Q 2

Q 3

Q 4

2010

122

125

118

117

2011

119

114

114

109

2012

105

99

93

89

2013

86

80

83

84


 Compute seasonal indices by using the ratio-to-trend method.

Solution:

Year

Quarter

Y = TCSI

t

Y x t

t^2

Y^t = TC

SI

2010

1

122

-15

-1830

225

127.5736

95.63107

2

125

-13

-1625

169

124.3721

100.5048

3

118

-11

-1298

121

121.1706

97.38333

4

117

-9

-1053

81

117.9692

99.17846

2011

1

119

-7

-833

49

114.7677

103.6877

2

114

-5

-570

25

111.5662

102.1815

3

114

-3

-342

9

108.3647

105.2003

4

109

-1

-109

1

105.1632

103.6484

2012

1

105

1

105

1

101.9618

102.9798

2

99

3

297

9

98.76028

100.2427

3

93

5

465

25

95.5588

97.32228

4

89

7

623

49

92.35732

96.36486

2013

1

86

9

774

81

89.15584

96.46031

2

80

11

880

121

85.95436

93.07265

3

83

13

1079

169

82.75288

100.2986

4

84

15

1260

225

79.5514

105.5921

1657

-2177

1360
























Estimated Trend Line:


The average seasonal indices are:

Year

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

2010

95.63107

100.5048

97.38333

99.17846

2011

103.6877

102.1815

105.2003

103.6484

2012

102.9798

100.2427

97.32228

96.36486

2013

96.46031

93.07265

100.2986

105.5921

Total

398.7589

396.0017

400.2045

404.7838

Mean

99.68972

99.00043

100.0511

101.196

399.9372

SI

99.70537

99.01596

100.0668

101.2118


 The SI row is obtained by multiplying the mean row by CF:



Alternative way to compute seasonal indices:

Compute the average of trend values (TC):

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

2010

127.5736

124.3721

121.1706

117.9692

2011

114.7677

111.5662

108.3647

105.1632

2012

101.9618

98.76028

95.5588

92.35732

2013

89.15584

85.95436

82.75288

79.5514

Total

433.4589

420.653

407.847

395.0411

Mean

108.3647

105.1632

101.9618

98.76028

414.25

Corrected Mean

104.637

101.5457

98.45432

95.36297

400


The corrected mean is obtained as:

Corrected Mean = Mean x CF

The seasonal indices for each year are obtained as:

SI for 2010:

116.5935

123.0973

119.8525

122.6891

 

SI for 2011:

113.7265

112.2648

115.7897

114.3001

 



No comments:

Post a Comment

Moving Average Models (MA Models) Lecture 17

  Moving Average Models  (MA Models)  Lecture 17 The autoregressive model in which the current value 'yt' of the dependent variable ...