Measurement of Seasonal Variation by Ratio to Trend Method
Lecture 07
The ratio to trend values approach is similar to the ratio
to moving average method. The method for calculating tend values (TC) is the
only distinction. The trend values are calculated by using the least squares
method. The ratio-to-trend method, which isolates the seasonal effect, is used
to determine the following ratios:
TCSI / TC * 100
The steps of the method are summarised as follows:
1. Use the least-squares approach to compute the trend values.
2. Take the trend value out. By dividing the original data values by the associated trend values and multiplying these ratios by 100 in a multiplicative model, the trend is removed. The results produced in this manner are trend-free.
3. For each year, group the percentage data values from Step (ii) according to the months or quarters that apply.
De Trending
The process of eliminating the impacts of the trend
component from time series data that have been seen. Detrending is mostly used
to identify seasonal or cyclical patterns efficiently.
Assume multiplicative model; the observed time series is given by
Yt = TCSI
SI = TCSI / TC * 100
Assume additive model
Yt = T + C + S + I
SI = T + C + S + I - T - C
The detrended time series is also known as the stationary time
series.
There are two common methods used to detrend the time
series data:
Detrend by the Ratio-to-Trend method
In ratio to the trend method, the observed time series (Yt = TCSI) is divided by trend estimated values (Yt^ = TC).
i.e.,
SI = Yt / Y^t * 100
Detrend by Differencing
In this method a new data set is developed by the difference between itself and previous observations.
Practice Question
The data given below is the average annual sale (00, 000, 000)
of the shop.
|
Year |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
|
sale |
8 |
13 |
18 |
14 |
13 |
18 |
24 |
20 |
18 |
24 |
|
Year |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
|
Sale |
27 |
20 |
28 |
32 |
29 |
28 |
30 |
37 |
34 |
|
Assume both multiplicative and additive models and detrend the data by the least squares method.
Solution
Assume a multiplicative model and use the ratio to the trend line.
|
year |
Yt |
|
Yt x t |
t^2 |
Y^t = 39.52 + 1.3174 t |
SI = Yt / Y^t * 100 |
|
1990 |
8 |
-9 |
-72 |
81 |
27.6625 |
28.92002 |
|
1991 |
13 |
-8 |
-104 |
64 |
28.98 |
44.85852 |
|
1992 |
18 |
-7 |
-126 |
49 |
30.2975 |
59.41084 |
|
1993 |
14 |
-6 |
-84 |
36 |
31.615 |
44.28278 |
|
1994 |
13 |
-5 |
-65 |
25 |
32.9325 |
39.47468 |
|
1995 |
18 |
-4 |
-72 |
16 |
34.25 |
52.55474 |
|
1996 |
24 |
-3 |
-72 |
9 |
35.5675 |
67.47733 |
|
1997 |
20 |
-2 |
-40 |
4 |
36.885 |
54.22258 |
|
1998 |
18 |
-1 |
-18 |
1 |
38.2025 |
47.11734 |
|
1999 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39.52 |
60.72874 |
|
2000 |
27 |
1 |
27 |
1 |
40.8375 |
66.1157 |
|
2001 |
20 |
2 |
40 |
4 |
42.155 |
47.44396 |
|
2002 |
28 |
3 |
84 |
9 |
43.4725 |
64.40853 |
|
2003 |
32 |
4 |
128 |
16 |
44.79 |
71.44452 |
|
2004 |
29 |
5 |
145 |
25 |
46.1075 |
62.89649 |
|
2005 |
28 |
6 |
168 |
36 |
47.425 |
59.04059 |
|
2006 |
30 |
7 |
210 |
49 |
48.7425 |
61.54793 |
|
2007 |
37 |
8 |
296 |
64 |
50.06 |
73.91131 |
|
2008 |
34 |
9 |
306 |
81 |
51.3775 |
66.17683 |
|
435 |
751 |
570 |
|
Assume
additive model and using differencing method
|
Year |
Yt |
SI = |
|
1990 |
8 |
|
|
1991 |
13 |
5 |
|
1992 |
18 |
5 |
|
1993 |
14 |
-4 |
|
1994 |
13 |
-1 |
|
1995 |
18 |
5 |
|
1996 |
24 |
6 |
|
1997 |
20 |
-4 |
|
1998 |
18 |
-2 |
|
1999 |
24 |
-6 |
|
2000 |
27 |
3 |
|
2001 |
20 |
-7 |
|
2002 |
28 |
8 |
|
2003 |
32 |
4 |
|
2004 |
29 |
-3 |
|
2005 |
28 |
-1 |
|
2006 |
30 |
2 |
|
2007 |
37 |
7 |
|
2008 |
34 |
-3 |
Practice Question
The profit
of a grocery store is given below:
|
Year |
Q 1 |
Q 2 |
Q 3 |
Q 4 |
|
2010 |
122 |
125 |
118 |
117 |
|
2011 |
119 |
114 |
114 |
109 |
|
2012 |
105 |
99 |
93 |
89 |
|
2013 |
86 |
80 |
83 |
84 |
Compute seasonal indices by using the ratio-to-trend method.
Solution:
|
Year |
Quarter |
Y = TCSI |
t
|
Y x t |
t^2 |
Y^t = TC |
SI |
|
2010 |
1 |
122 |
-15 |
-1830 |
225 |
127.5736 |
95.63107 |
|
2 |
125 |
-13 |
-1625 |
169 |
124.3721 |
100.5048 |
|
|
3 |
118 |
-11 |
-1298 |
121 |
121.1706 |
97.38333 |
|
|
4 |
117 |
-9 |
-1053 |
81 |
117.9692 |
99.17846 |
|
|
2011 |
1 |
119 |
-7 |
-833 |
49 |
114.7677 |
103.6877 |
|
2 |
114 |
-5 |
-570 |
25 |
111.5662 |
102.1815 |
|
|
3 |
114 |
-3 |
-342 |
9 |
108.3647 |
105.2003 |
|
|
4 |
109 |
-1 |
-109 |
1 |
105.1632 |
103.6484 |
|
|
2012 |
1 |
105 |
1 |
105 |
1 |
101.9618 |
102.9798 |
|
2 |
99 |
3 |
297 |
9 |
98.76028 |
100.2427 |
|
|
3 |
93 |
5 |
465 |
25 |
95.5588 |
97.32228 |
|
|
4 |
89 |
7 |
623 |
49 |
92.35732 |
96.36486 |
|
|
2013 |
1 |
86 |
9 |
774 |
81 |
89.15584 |
96.46031 |
|
2 |
80 |
11 |
880 |
121 |
85.95436 |
93.07265 |
|
|
3 |
83 |
13 |
1079 |
169 |
82.75288 |
100.2986 |
|
|
4 |
84 |
15 |
1260 |
225 |
79.5514 |
105.5921 |
|
|
1657 |
-2177 |
1360 |
Estimated Trend Line:
The average seasonal indices are:
|
Year |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
|
|
2010 |
95.63107 |
100.5048 |
97.38333 |
99.17846 |
|
|
2011 |
103.6877 |
102.1815 |
105.2003 |
103.6484 |
|
|
2012 |
102.9798 |
100.2427 |
97.32228 |
96.36486 |
|
|
2013 |
96.46031 |
93.07265 |
100.2986 |
105.5921 |
|
|
Total |
398.7589 |
396.0017 |
400.2045 |
404.7838 |
|
|
Mean |
99.68972 |
99.00043 |
100.0511 |
101.196 |
399.9372 |
|
SI |
99.70537 |
99.01596 |
100.0668 |
101.2118 |
The SI row is obtained by
multiplying the mean row by CF:
Alternative way to compute seasonal indices:
Compute the average of trend values (TC):
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
||
|
2010 |
127.5736 |
124.3721 |
121.1706 |
117.9692 |
|
|
2011 |
114.7677 |
111.5662 |
108.3647 |
105.1632 |
|
|
2012 |
101.9618 |
98.76028 |
95.5588 |
92.35732 |
|
|
2013 |
89.15584 |
85.95436 |
82.75288 |
79.5514 |
|
|
Total |
433.4589 |
420.653 |
407.847 |
395.0411 |
|
|
Mean |
108.3647 |
105.1632 |
101.9618 |
98.76028 |
414.25 |
|
Corrected
Mean |
104.637 |
101.5457 |
98.45432 |
95.36297 |
400 |
The corrected mean is obtained as:
Corrected Mean = Mean x CF
The seasonal indices for each year are obtained as:
SI for 2010:
|
116.5935 |
123.0973 |
119.8525 |
122.6891 |
SI for 2011:
|
113.7265 |
112.2648 |
115.7897 |
114.3001 |








No comments:
Post a Comment