The variance of the disturbance term is assumed to be
fixed (constant) for all explanatory variable values in the classical linear
regression model.
That is
In
a scatter plot, the residual values cluster around the
regression line without taking any particular shape due to homoscedasticity.
if the assumption of constant variance for explanatory
variable values is violated and the variance of the disturbance term is not
constant for all explanatory variable values, then the variance of the error
term is hetroscedastic and the phenomenon is known as hetroscedasticity.
That is
Diagrammatically the phenomenon of Hetrosecdasticity is given below:
In homoscedasticity, we
assume that response variable vary as predictor vary but the
variance of
(which is equivalent
to the variance of the disturbance term) is constant for all predictors. In heteroscedasticity, response variable vary as predictors vary but the
variance of the disturbance term is also vary.
This leads to the conclusion that Xi is a function of the variance of the disturbance term.
In heteroscedasticity, the residual values display a cone like structure.
Example: Consider regressing luxury spending (Y) on family income (X).
Case I: For families with modest incomes
The residual will be quite small because almost all low-income
families don’t spend much on luxuries. In this instance, the disturbance term's variance is homoscedastic.
Case II: For families with high incomes
The size of the residuals varies greatly among high
income families. because some families spend significantly more on luxury goods
than others, who tend to spend less. Because the extent of the error varies
depending on the values of the independent variable, this situation displays
heteroscedasticity.
Different kinds of Heteroscedastic Structures
Three different heteroscedastic structures are present.
As follows:
1. If the disturbance term's variance rises as Xi increases.
It can be expressed as:
Graphic representations include the following:
2. If the disturbance term's variance increases as Xi falls.
It can be written as;
Graphic representations include the following:
3. It can be stated as follows if the variance of the disturbance term oscillates with
.
Heteroscedasticity's causes
The variance of the disturbance term may vary for a number of reasons.
Below are a few of them:
1.
The Nature of the Phenomenon
under Investigation
The
nature of the phenomenon under study might have an increasing or decreasing
tendency.
e.g., as income rises,
the variety in food consumption patterns grows. In this case variance of the disturbance term is expected to increase.
As people learn their error of behaviour become smaller over time. In this case, variance of the disturbance tern is expected to decrease.
e.g.,
The number of typing mistakes decreases as the number of hours of typing
practice increases.
2.
Streamline Data
Collection & Processing Methods
The
variance of error term is expected to decrease as the data collection and
processing methods advance. Therefore, the institutions that use sophisticated
techniques for data collection and processing have lower error rates.
1.
The Model & Incorrect data Transformation
Heteroscedasticity is also caused by faulty data transformation and functional form in the model.
For instance, it is simpler to gather information about family-wide clothing expenses than it is about a single family member.
Consider a straightforward linear regression model.
Data collection for each family member might be challenging, but data collection for the entire family is simpler.
Consequently, Yij is is known as a whole.
The information on average spending for each family member is then found as follows, rather than per person expenditure:
This shows that the variance of the resulting
disturbance term is depend on the family size “mij” and not constant.
Heteroscedasticity therefore manifests in the data. The variance of the
disturbance term will be constant, if all families have identical size.
4.
Inaccurate model stipulation
Heteroscedasticity results from the model leaving out a significant variable for a variety of reasons.
5.
Existence of Outliers
The existence of outliers can also lead to
heterosexuality. Such observations
might significantly change the outcomes of regression analysis, especially when
the sample size is small.
- Read More: Detection of Hetroscedasticity
- Read More: Consequences of Hetroscedasticity














No comments:
Post a Comment